-
Samenvatting
In the relationship between the Ministry of Justice and Security and the Scientific Research and Documentation Center, safeguards to prevent improper influence of research were lacking. In the opinion of the WODC II investigation committee, civil servants were too close to the substantive execution of the investigation, as a result of which the WODC was given too little room for critical investigation. For other ministries and knowledge institutions the question is relevant as to what safeguards are needed for conducting independent research. Rules and procedures are not sufficient for creating and maintaining responsible research practices. It is also important that employees learn to recognize difficult situations, can discuss these with their colleagues, and know how to deal with dilemmas. Other organizations can learn from the WODC issue that they must maintain and recalibrate the formal and professional safeguards for the independence of scientific research. Trust in science stands or falls with independence and soundness in word and deed.
Bestuurskunde |
|
Article | Leren van de WODC-casusFormele en professionele waarborgen voor onafhankelijk onderzoek vergen onderhoud |
Trefwoorden | professional safeguards, policy influence, independence, scientific research |
Auteurs | Dr. Meike Bokhorst |
DOI | 10.5553/Bk/092733872019029004006 |
Auteursinformatie |
Kies uw weergave