-
Samenvatting
In this political philosophy article we contribute to the question whether the covid-measures of the state fundamentally change the relation between state and society. One the one hand, we seek to explain this from the perspective of different forms of power government applies. On the other hand, we seek to understand the nature of freedom and the legitimation to restrict freedom. We notice in contemporary administration a habitus that is extremely ambivalent. On the one side, freedom is perceived as not being restrained to do, say or think whatever one wants (negative freedom). On the other hand, we notice that this freedom is not entrusted to civilians (or civilians do not entrust it to themselves), but is materialized, in great detail, by government itself. Although a pandemic may legitimize extraordinary measures, we argue that, for the sake of the future of our political democracy, the state and its administration needs to develop more self-consciousness regarding the forms of power it applies. Also, it needs to be accountable to what extent it values freedom.
Bestuurskunde |
|
Article | Biopolitieke macht en de vrijheid van de burgerHoe de politieke democratie op het spel staat in en na het coronabeleid |
Trefwoorden | power, negative freedom, positive freedom, COVID-19, political democracy |
Auteurs | Henk den Uijl en Paul Frissen |
DOI | 10.5553/Bk/092733872021030003007 |
Auteursinformatie |
Kies uw weergave